This goes to European Court of Human Rights. It may find out that cancelling election results was unnecessary. https://www.ejiltalk.org/electoral-dysfunction-r

This goes to European Court of Human Rights. It may find out that cancelling election results was unnecessary. https://www.ejiltalk.org/electoral-dysfunction-romanias-election-annulment-disinformation-and-echr-positive-obligations-to-combat-election-irregularities/ https://www.ejiltalk.org/electoral-dysfunction-romanias-elec... > Here, the opposite could be alleged- that Romania took action, but the action was too immediate and drastic than was called for in the circumstances. Considering how the Court expressed a critical view of overly drastic measures in cases such as the above-mentioned Kermiova v Azerbaijan, it is possible that the Court could similarly show a disdain for the expeditious actions taken by the domestic judiciary in Romania. Also apparently most voters voted this candidate because of economic reasos, not due to Russian proximity.