3 ms·
Except you don't need an LLM to do any of this, and it's already computationally cheaper. If you don't know the results you want, you should figure that out fir
by mochajocha 2y ago
Except you don't need an LLM to do any of this, and it's already computationally cheaper. If you don't know the results you want, you should figure that out first, instead of asking a Markov chain to do it.
- tomrod 2y agoI believe this approach is destined for a lot of disappointment. LLMs enable a LOT of entry- and mid-level performance, quickly. Rightfully, you and I worry about the edge cases and bugs. But people will trend towards things that enable them to do things faster.