4 ms·

http://www.angryflower.com/atlass.gif http://www.angryflower.com/atlass.gif

dmix 18y ago
I'm more on the less-government side but that comic always bothered me. There are many instances in Ayn Rands writing where she praised the laborers for their hard work. My impression was that she didn't believe that only a few "men of the mind" should be at the top and everyone else does the hard work for them. It was more about valuing the laborer who works harder then everyone else instead of the one who believes he deserves higher compensation without contributing anything more then the minimum requirements.
- joe_bleau 18y ago
  Agree that she respected manual labor: after all, the heroic Howard Roark character worked in a granite quarry for a time in "The Fountainhead".
  - walterk 18y ago
    Don't forget the philosopher who made burgers.
    - unalone 18y ago
      Or the physicist who worked as a low-level railroad operator. I hate that most of the detractors of Atlas Shrugged misread the message. There are things to criticize, but the ones that do get criticized (Ayn Rand is a Nazi, she ignores the common laborer, she dares include a pirate as a character) are the ones that don't really matter regarding the main theme/are entirely wrong.
      - dgordon 18y ago
        "I hate that most of the detractors of Atlas Shrugged misread the message." You assume they read it at all.
        unalone 18y ago
        There is a famous scathing review by Whittaker Chambers (of the Alger Hiss controversy) that later got accusations that he'd never read it. Some people who criticize Atlas Shrugged obviously have read it to at least some degree. They may have been skimming, or they might not have had an open mind, but some of the points are always satirisations of some parts of the novel. Occasionally it's done well. Usually it's just a waste.
      - anewaccountname 18y ago
        I thought Rand put that physicist there to show how a society with what were in her view the wrong priorities misappropriated talent.
        unalone 18y ago
        She does, yes, and it's said that it's a waste of talent for Galt, but the job itself is not considered offensive. Galt doesn't get shown much because he's in hiding, but the philosopher gets a few paragraphs describing how relieving it is, his ability to make good food. It's a sign that there are still people who take delight in what they do.
    - xayide 18y ago
      Or the part where Dagney cooked and kept house for John Galt as repayment for her staying with him.
  - deleted 18y ago
    [deleted]
  - deleted 18y ago
    [deleted]
Eliezer 18y ago
Comic author noted afterward that he hadn't actually read the book, wasn't aware that Rearden had (in the ficton) invented the metal himself, etc.
- dgordon 18y ago
  Why am I not surprised? Thanks for mentioning that.

dmix 18y ago

I'm more on the less-government side but that comic always bothered me. There are many instances in Ayn Rands writing where she praised the laborers for their hard work. My impression was that she didn't believe that only a few "men of the mind" should be at the top and everyone else does the hard work for them. It was more about valuing the laborer who works harder then everyone else instead of the one who believes he deserves higher compensation without contributing anything more then the minimum requirements.

joe_bleau 18y ago
Agree that she respected manual labor: after all, the heroic Howard Roark character worked in a granite quarry for a time in "The Fountainhead".
- walterk 18y ago
  Don't forget the philosopher who made burgers.
  - unalone 18y ago
    Or the physicist who worked as a low-level railroad operator. I hate that most of the detractors of Atlas Shrugged misread the message. There are things to criticize, but the ones that do get criticized (Ayn Rand is a Nazi, she ignores the common laborer, she dares include a pirate as a character) are the ones that don't really matter regarding the main theme/are entirely wrong.
    - dgordon 18y ago
      "I hate that most of the detractors of Atlas Shrugged misread the message." You assume they read it at all.
      - unalone 18y ago
        There is a famous scathing review by Whittaker Chambers (of the Alger Hiss controversy) that later got accusations that he'd never read it. Some people who criticize Atlas Shrugged obviously have read it to at least some degree. They may have been skimming, or they might not have had an open mind, but some of the points are always satirisations of some parts of the novel. Occasionally it's done well. Usually it's just a waste.
    - anewaccountname 18y ago
      I thought Rand put that physicist there to show how a society with what were in her view the wrong priorities misappropriated talent.
      - unalone 18y ago
        She does, yes, and it's said that it's a waste of talent for Galt, but the job itself is not considered offensive. Galt doesn't get shown much because he's in hiding, but the philosopher gets a few paragraphs describing how relieving it is, his ability to make good food. It's a sign that there are still people who take delight in what they do.
  - xayide 18y ago
    Or the part where Dagney cooked and kept house for John Galt as repayment for her staying with him.
- deleted 18y ago
  [deleted]
- deleted 18y ago
  [deleted]

Eliezer 18y ago

Comic author noted afterward that he hadn't actually read the book, wasn't aware that Rearden had (in the ficton) invented the metal himself, etc.

dgordon 18y ago
Why am I not surprised? Thanks for mentioning that.