> but it misses the point. I don't think it misses the point as much as it's an entirely different point. When I talk to my coworkers about the uses of these a

> but it misses the point. I don't think it misses the point as much as it's an entirely different point. When I talk to my coworkers about the uses of these automated marshaling systems at the boundary, they're not talking about correctness or "evolution". They talk about how annoying they find it to type. In the fingers hitting keyboard sense of that word. They explicitly don't want a change 10 layers deep to result in any error in the parsing layer. They want the magical system to just do something at runtime.