4 ms·
If I understand TFA correctly that's a claim it's covering and arguing against, not arguing for.
by KTibow 2y ago
If I understand TFA correctly that's a claim it's covering and arguing against, not arguing for.
- blharr 2y agoBy TFA do you mean the author of the article? It seems to be using an outdated [and incorrect] claim (as far as I know, GPT-4 has no note of taking 200 flights of energy to train), arguing against it saying that those numbers are especially small, when they are potentially significantly larger.