2 ms·
The problem is that good journalism doesn't have funding. Otherwise this shit would never have made it into a newspaper, maybe outside of a really shitty yellow
by mschuster91 2y ago
The problem is that good journalism doesn't have funding. Otherwise this shit would never have made it into a newspaper, maybe outside of a really shitty yellow rag.
- DaiPlusPlus 2y ago> The problem is that good journalism doesn't have funding. The BBC and Reuters can be posited as counterexamples to your assertion. They’re good journalists and well-funded (and not primarily by advertising either).
- prerok 2y agoHmm... but do you think that they would produce such an article, funding the research into it? From what I can tell, they would report accurately once these findings were published but would not find a researcher to dig into the claims before publishing that someone (named) said that these chips are at fault.
- mschuster91 2y agoBBC is under constant threat of getting defunded, it's almost a meme at this point, and on top of that is generally under constant attack. Reuters doesn't do much local or regional stuff.
- immibis 2y agoWhich firm's journalist was it that just got arrested at a press conference for asking questions about Israel?
- DaiPlusPlus 2y agoEjected, not arrested: https://news.yahoo.com/news/antony-blinken-kicks-journalist-asking-213345748.html https://news.yahoo.com/news/antony-blinken-kicks-journalist-...