3 ms·

I'm tempted to say: what's the point if you've preemptively disregarded it as made up "American propaganda." But here you go anyway: https://en.wikipedia.org/w

I'm tempted to say: what's the point if you've preemptively disregarded it as made up "American propaganda." But here you go anyway: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt_Typhoon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt_Typhoon

bjourne 2y ago
Yes, what is the point if the cites you have are all based on speculation and vague allegations by US officials? Do you actually have credible evidence that a group affiliated with the Chinese government hacked American ISPs? If not, don't bother.
- stevenAthompson 2y ago
  CISA does. Much of it has been made public. Google it yourself, if you're actually interested. It's fascinating.
  - bjourne 2y ago
    What makes you think I haven't googled it already? Yes, the US CISA agency claims it. But no evidence has been presented.
    - herbst 2y ago
      Even if there were some kind of evidence, the US doesn't actually have a track record on being honest with anything like that.
- pdabbadabba 2y ago
  > the cites you have are all based on speculation and vague allegations by US officials Totally untrue. It was also confirmed by officials from affected companies as well as Cybersecurity monitoring companies. There is quite a bit more detail and substantiation -- even in the Wikipedia article -- than you are acknowledging.