4 ms·
The problem is, the world does't need meta/google/twtr either. The bill would eventually backfire US internet companies so bad.
by est 2y ago
The problem is, the world does't need meta/google/twtr either. The bill would eventually backfire US internet companies so bad.
- airstrike 2y agoI don't understand what this has to do with US companies at all. It's about foreign companies.
- walls 2y agoThe government makes Meta and Xitter suppress Palestinian content, they can't do that to TikTok, so it's being banned.
- airstrike 2y agoThis is demonstrably false as the discussion about banning TikTok predates the current conflict in Gaza by a long time.
- mrtksn 2y agoWhy do you think that Bezos and Zuckerberg have seen the light with the elections if the US government has nothing to do with these private enterprises? Twitter and Meta are foreign everywhere else, everywhere else except China TikTok is foreign as well and apparently they all lick their respective governments.
- airstrike 2y agoAnd if Twitter and Meta are found to be interfering with national interests in foreign countries and get banned or reeled in due to that, how is that a bad outcome for the world?
- mrtksn 2y agoit is a bad outcome because it means everyone is locked in their propaganda locality and theres no one to break the narrative. IMHO it’s beneficial to have a global network as we are living on a planet with artificial borders.
- airstrike 2y agoLess propaganda is always better. Less foreign propaganda doubly so. There's no benefit in a plurality of propaganda.
- mrtksn 2y agoExactly how I expect things to pan out. Some 10-15 years ago the countries with dictatorships had the idea that they need to control the discussions on internet, now it is the US. I expect it to have cascading effect as Twitter, FB, Instagram etc are all foreign companies with known associations with the US government and intelligence and ban those everywhere fir national security reasons.