4 ms·
Sucker's bet. They almost certainly do. The question is more would the homeowners have actually been better off if the homes were more damaged requiring being r
by leeter 2y ago
Sucker's bet. They almost certainly do. The question is more would the homeowners have actually been better off if the homes were more damaged requiring being rebuilt? Based on anecdotes from the Hawaii fires... the answer is: Maybe. Combustion products are notoriously hard to remediate. Just living in those houses post fire could be the equivalent of giving yourself smoke inhalation issues.
- exhilaration 2y agoNY Times did a big article on this: http://bit.ly/3E9mA5U http://bit.ly/3E9mA5U Far fewer resources for those whose homes weren't destroyed but insurance should still cover the smoke damage remediation.