4 ms·
The landing was completely developed at SpaceX without NASA tech, assistance or money. By Lars. After figuring out parachutes were infeasible. In fact it was o
by inemesitaffia 2y ago
The landing was completely developed at SpaceX without NASA tech, assistance or money. By Lars. After figuring out parachutes were infeasible.
In fact it was one of the reasons red dragon was cancelled.
The group studying hypersonic retro propulsion of boosters at NASA was let go because that's what SpaceX did to land
- lamontcg 2y agoThe Air Force was studying RTLS as part of the ARES (Affordable REsponsive Spacelift) program in 2005 (Which was the result of 1992/1994-era discussions on "spacecast 2020"): https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2005-6682 https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2005-6682 Lars and Beschet wrote their groundbreaking paper on lossless convexification of the powered descent problem at JPL before Lars went to SpaceX: http://www.larsblackmore.com/CarsonAcikmeseBlackmoreACC11.pdf http://www.larsblackmore.com/CarsonAcikmeseBlackmoreACC11.pd...
- inemesitaffia 2y agoBlue Origin landed first, where was that from? And I don't see any rocket actually coming back with an orbital payload? Where's the demonstrator? Like that quiet supersonic thing Lockheed is demonstrating. Even Lars didn't deliver at the first attempt. So it's not like it was something available off the shelf. Like some cryptography library you include in your code.
- lamontcg 2y agoNASA was also considering reusable two stage to orbit for the shuttle back in the 1960s. By 1998 NASA was proposing Liquid Flyback Boosters: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19980237254/downloads/19980237254.pdf https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19980237254/downloads/19... Those were still winged boosters, but were not helicopter-caught and did RTLS. Musk didn't invent the concept.
- inemesitaffia 2y agoYou can write papers all you want. I know only one company landing orbital boosters.