3 ms·
> Is that a bad thing? Is it a bad thing that we should consider most of the planet unlivable because disasters happen that aren't eternally and increasingly p
by Tadpole9181 2y ago
> Is that a bad thing?
Is it a bad thing that we should consider most of the planet unlivable because disasters happen that aren't eternally and increasingly profitable to insure?
Is it a bad thing that literally tens of millions of Americans would no longer have insurance? That you're asking double digit percents of the entire population to leave cities and just... what? Suddenly have new homes in a region with plentiful resources and access to water and food and an economy and no disaster potential?
Is it a bad thing to compare entire states to missile testing grounds?
Is this satire?
- rcpt 2y agoMost of the populated areas are perfectly safe from fire. https://wildfiretaskforce.org/updated-fire-hazard-severity-zone-map-available-for-public-comment/ https://wildfiretaskforce.org/updated-fire-hazard-severity-z...
- Tadpole9181 2y agoLet's add hurricanes, tornados, earthquakes, tsunamis, monsoons, etc. You're being intentionally obtuse.