Other than the bloke who tried to make his LLM the author, I havent seen any lawsuits uphold your point of view. There was a great article posted here last yea

Other than the bloke who tried to make his LLM the author, I havent seen any lawsuits uphold your point of view. There was a great article posted here last year rounding up all the various courts who upheld ownership for prompters of LLM output, including China (Possibly twice) If recombining data from images in a way that theres not a single trace of any original violates fair use, then fair use ceases to exist. There is hardly a fairer use. Any existing fair use outcome uses actual recognizable elements of the original work. There isn't really 2 directions on this. The damage that success for the anti ai folk would have against IP law is tremendous.