2 ms·
> This isn't what "out of distribution" means. There can be ZERO images and it wouldn't mean something is OOD. OOD means not within the underlying distribution
by throwaway314155 2y ago
> This isn't what "out of distribution" means. There can be ZERO images and it wouldn't mean something is OOD. OOD means not within the underlying distribution. That's why I made the whole point about interpolation.
Sure. I'll concede to that, although it's a bit pedantic.
> Is it scarce? Hard to tell. But I wouldn't make that assumption based on my examples. Search is poisoned now.
I was more referring to why it originally was used, not why it would still be used. In any case, I maintain that it was _not_ used for being OOD, which I mentioned in my first comment.
> Add 2 spaces
> on a new
> line and
> ...
Yeah, I still hate it. Sorry. Give me markdown support and I'll be happy.
edit: I'll leave my mistake here as an example of why it's non-intuitive.
- godelski 2y ago> although it's a bit pedantic. If we're discussing research -- and I think this is fair since we're discussing a link to an arxiv paper -- then being pedantic matters. Things have definitions and we are supposed to know what they mean. > Give me markdown support and I'll be happy. You and me both