This is AI spam. There's no sources, and it's from a no-name publication from India. The article doesn't even attempt to justify the title. This article is an

This is AI spam. There's no sources, and it's from a no-name publication from India. The article doesn't even attempt to justify the title. This article is an AI rewrite of a Jan 12th article from Times of India[1], which cites an article from The San Francisco Standard[2]. The original article, from 1/8 (last week), merely refers to it as an "active and open investigation"... NOT that the status was changed. [1] https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/suchir-balajis-case-under-active-investigation-mother-says-he-was-not-okay-with-openai-becoming-for-profit/articleshow/117153170.cms https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/suchir-balajis-... [2] https://sfstandard.com/2025/01/08/openai-whistleblowers-death-sparks-dark-conspiracy-theories/ https://sfstandard.com/2025/01/08/openai-whistleblowers-deat...