3 ms·
With times like that you'd be better off with Starlink! I'm not joking: https://www.pcmag.com/news/is-starlink-good-for-gaming-we-put-spacexs-satellite-service
by fidotron 2y ago
With times like that you'd be better off with Starlink!
I'm not joking:
https://www.pcmag.com/news/is-starlink-good-for-gaming-we-put-spacexs-satellite-service-to-the-test https://www.pcmag.com/news/is-starlink-good-for-gaming-we-pu...
Are you doing the 113 test from the actual device, or something tethered to it? For example, you don't want a bluetooth stack in the middle.
- x0x0 2y agostraight off my android phone by disabling wifi then moving through my 2 sims
- pinoy420 2y agoDon’t take the bait. It is a typical hn hyperbole comment
- throw5959 2y agoIf you have a dual SIM phone, try to swap your SIMs.
- fidotron 2y agoThat is odd then, but it is odd. I can only guess the connectivity between your mast and the Internet is awfully congested, and/or you are in the middle of nowhere. One of the reasons starlink does as well as it does is the ground stations are well connected to the wider world, whereas your nearest cell mast might not be.
- harrall 2y agoNah it could also be differing peering agreements with the ISP and the data center you are connecting to. On T-Mobile, I get 30ms to Cloudflare but 150ms to my local AWS. But I also get 450 mbps on T-Mobile so I’m not complaining.