> Who decides what is a fact? The company? Government-selected "trusted flaggers": Nonetheless, under the DSA, the status of trusted flagger is awarded by the

> Who decides what is a fact? The company? Government-selected "trusted flaggers": Nonetheless, under the DSA, the status of trusted flagger is awarded by the "Digital Services Coordinator," which is a national authority responsible for supervising the services of online platforms. The DSA allows law enforcement agencies or profit-seeking industry organizations to apply for the status of a trusted flagger, the notices of which must be treated with priority. - https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/02/enforcement-overreach-could-turn-out-be-real-problem-eus-digital-services-act https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/02/enforcement-overreach-... Oh, and executive-branch agencies can order take-downs, without a court signing off: Article 8 empowers national judicial or administrative authorities to issue mandatory takedown orders directly to “intermediary services" such as social media networks. In its recent vote, the Parliament rejected EFF’s suggestion and the proposal by the Civil Liberties Committee to limit these powers to independent courts. Instead, the Parliament followed the Commission’s proposal and allowed a broad category of non-independent authorities to exercise this power.