4 ms·

Considering the current numbering scheme, 0.9 will be the unstable version of 1.0. Which means 0.9 should give us a very good idea of the final backwards compat

• JakaJancar 14y ago
  Or it might be the unstable version of 0.10. The dots are there for a reason.
  • feronull 14y ago
    imo next version will be 1.0 because they are on the fast releasing period
    • JakaJancar 14y ago
      Possibly, I'm just commenting on the logic that 0.9 is followed by 1.0 (or 1.9 by 2.0, if you want).
  • aaronblohowiak 14y ago
    IMHO, it should be followed by 0.12, because 0.10 is too confusable with 0.1, but 0.12 is clearly a new version...
    • pygy_ 14y ago
      They use a variation on semantic versioning, which is pretty standard: major.minor.revision revision is incremented when backwards compatible bug fixes are added minor is incremented when backwards compatible features are added major is incremented when backwards incompatible change is introduced. All of them are integers, and the smaller ones are reset to 0 when a bigger one is incremented. For versions 0.x.x (pre v1), backwards incompatible changes are allowed at any time. There are more rules, see http://semver.org/ http://semver.org/