4 ms·
> implying that having money in itself (and not a specific way of behaving) is wrong, unethical, and worthy of exclusion. Having money in the abstract is not.
by bo0tzz 2y ago
> implying that having money in itself (and not a specific way of behaving) is wrong, unethical, and worthy of exclusion.
Having money in the abstract is not. But being a billionaire is.
- disqard 2y agoI think you are (rightly) pointing out that "quantity has its own quality". As an analogy, this is similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandrasekhar_limit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandrasekhar_limit. To GP: It's less "no one should have any mass". It's more "Billionaires are like Black Holes, and therefore should be avoided" -- yes, it is a value judgement; no, it's not a blanket statement about money.