3 ms·
Yes, when I see something written by AI I don't read it. Its a waste of time.
by hoppp 2y ago
Yes, when I see something written by AI I don't read it. Its a waste of time.
- reddalo 2y agoCold emails -- especially AI generated ones -- go directly to the trash in my mailbox.
- TeMPOraL 2y agoSame here, but AI is orthogonal to that. Spam is spam - there's no difference between one written by silicon-based LLM bot, and one written by protein-based low paid human bot.
- p0w3n3d 2y agoThat distinct feeling when reading AI is as if someone who wrote it was compelled to write more words
- ep103 2y agotl;dr: AI is looking to convey words. A good author is looking to efficiently convey information. Because that's literally what it is. Its an algorithm that is continuously asking itself, 'what is the most likely word I should say next?' Whereas an author that is intending to communicate a point, will start with an idea, write a passage to explain the idea, and then edit their passage to the minimum number of words that most precisely, accurately, and succinctly communicates that idea.
- SketchySeaBeast 2y agoI'll always love "If I had more time, I would have written you a shorter letter."
- p0w3n3d 2y agoThe most scary thing nowadays is that a lot of people fail Reverse Turing Test. They think that the thing there (the LLM) is thinking... They say "I told chat" etc. If high-ranking people will fail the test they are able to start using AI instead of thinking, or for example impose laws using AI...
- madethisnow 2y agoThis is untenable. I could be AI. You could be AI. The whole idea of value is going to change when there is 99.99% noise from AI, and genuine human created content will be hard to distinguish if at all.