3 ms·
those engineering cameras were not your regular run-of-the mill cameras neither. NASA published a 45 min documentary of the 10-15 engineering cameras of an STS
by ArnoVW 2y ago
those engineering cameras were not your regular run-of-the mill cameras neither.
NASA published a 45 min documentary of the 10-15 engineering cameras of an STS launch., with comments on the engineering aspets of the launch procedure.
Very beautiful, relaxing, has an almost meditative quality. Highly recommend it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFwqZ4qAUkE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFwqZ4qAUkE
- philipwhiuk 2y agoYeah and Shuttle cost a fortune per launch. Views are distinctly secondary to an affordable launch program.
- sandworm101 2y agoAnd the cost of the camera program was paid back a hundred times as that footage was used to diagnose, correct and improve countless systems. Accident investigations would have taken ten times as long without that footage.
- nickff 2y agoI absolutely love that beautiful film footage, particularly well-exhibited in one of my favorite documentaries, the spectacular "When We Left Earth" (a lovely and lengthy series). That said... Modern rockets have the ability to stream a great deal more data, including live camera streams, than the Mercury/Gemini/Apollo or Space Shuttle could. This increased real-time data bandwidth is probably much more valuable than high-dynamic-range cameras were.
- sandworm101 2y agoTelemetry only records what you deem interesting prior to flight. When something goes really wrong it probably came from something you were not expecting, like foam insulation. Cameras recorded everything visible, even the stuff you don't think important.
- bell-cot 2y agoI'd assume that BO has plenty of high-res/high-contrast-range imagery - that's just too useful for engineering analysis, post-launch. What they release to the public is a separate issue.