3 ms·
This illustrates a key problem selling Linux. Linux hardware = commodity. Linux software = commodity. commodity + commodity = commodity. There's no differe
by codex 14y ago
This illustrates a key problem selling Linux. Linux hardware = commodity. Linux software = commodity. commodity + commodity = commodity.
There's no differentiator here, for anyone. You might as well put a pinstripe on it, or tint the windows, or put on a Type-R muffler: in the end it's still a Honda Accord.
The best you can do is make sure that Linux runs well on your hardware, but as the hardware is a commodity, that's not much of a differentiator. And for sleep/wake issues you may not have the skills to make Linux work well on a laptop, because nobody does.
This problem also exists with Android, but in the mobile space handset makers are having some success differentiating on hardware and adding custom UI.
IBM makes a good chunk of change on Linux, but their model (admitting their solution isn't turn-key and charging a bunch of money on customization) doesn't work for laptops. And, of course, it offers no incentive to actually create turn-key software.
- ori_b 14y ago> This illustrates a key problem selling Linux. Linux hardware = commodity. Linux software = commodity. commodity + commodity = commodity. Sure, I don't disagree. I just don't see how the situation is different from Windows. Selling Wintel boxes is a low margin business, and it seems that selling Lintel boxes will be in the same boat.