2 ms·

> Last I checked solar without batteries is roughly the same price per Kw as nuclear. You didn't check, you decided to cook the presentation of the facts. Ind

> Last I checked solar without batteries is roughly the same price per Kw as nuclear. You didn't check, you decided to cook the presentation of the facts. Indeed, solar is not available 24/7. But it's not individual installations which need 24/7 availability, it's the grid as a whole; plus, energy use during the day and night differs, so even the grid as a whole doesn't need the same generation capacity 24/7. And - the grid has many different energy sources (i.e. not just solar and nuclear), some renewable and some non-renewable, which aren't daylight-only. Which is to say there is plenty of room for solar installations irrespective of energy storage solutions. And indeed, those installations are taking place, and they are rather cheap.

vlovich123 2y ago
> Indeed, solar is not available 24/7. But it's not individual installations which need 24/7 availability, it's the grid as a whole; plus, energy use during the day and night differs, so even the grid as a whole doesn't need the same generation capacity 24/7 The peak to trough is ~30% reduction if I recall correctly. It’s different but not massively so. And long distance energy transport is insanely expensive. It’s being done but mainly to stabilize the grid rather than arbitrage. And your entire solar capacity in the US goes offline for ~12+ hours. That’s a lot of energy you’re going to have to supplant in other ways regardless of long distance. > And indeed, those installations are taking place, and they are rather cheap. Because the cost of storage and the destabilization of the grid it causes the provider are treated as externalities.