3 ms·
I will disagree. Stating an obviously empirically false, easily observed statement immediately does set the table for a bad faith argument IMHO.
by 1970-01-01 2y ago
I will disagree. Stating an obviously empirically false,
easily observed statement immediately does set the table for a bad faith argument IMHO.
- bigstrat2003 2y agoIt's only in bad faith if the poster knows the statement to be false. You can't prove that they do, therefore it's pretty rude (to say the least) to accuse them of bad faith. It's also not remotely "easily observable" that humans constantly consume microplastic.
- 1970-01-01 2y ago> It's also not remotely "easily observable" that humans constantly consume microplastic. https://www.google.com/search?q=do+humans+eat+plastic https://www.google.com/search?q=do+humans+eat+plastic Less than 500ms on my end. This is turning into a knock-on bad faith argument. I'll end it here, before I need to defend that the earth isn't flat