3 ms·
Maintenance on aging plants is also very expensive (just ask the French) and German plants were getting long in the tooth. Decommissioning is also very, very e
by pydry 2y ago
Maintenance on aging plants is also very expensive (just ask the French) and German plants were getting long in the tooth.
Decommissioning is also very, very expensive, and disasters like Fukushima are also very very very expensive (that one cost about $1 trillion).
It wasn't some secret plot by Russia. Russia exported most of the uranium they used. Fukushima just made nuclear power more of a headache than it was worth, especially given the cost and pressure from the environmental movement (who had agency, despite what you might believe).
The reliance that the US/Europe had on Russian uranium is, in fact, one reason why it was never sanctioned.
The greens in Germany are mostly captured by America these days - that's why they shifted to becoming massive war hawks.
- blibble 2y ago> Maintenance on aging plants the three that were last turned off were practically new there was even one that was fully constructed and ready to be turend on, and then never was > Decommissioning is also very, very expensive but once the plant has gone live you'd be paying that anyway so you might as well keep the existing reactors running for as long as they remain safe > and disasters like Fukushima are also very very very expensive (that one cost about $1 trillion) fortunately germany isn't very prone to tsunami the russian psyop seems to have worked pretty well on you!