3 ms·
I don't understand a thing about most of the subjects depicted in those charts so I can't discuss their contents. But couldn't it be another case of confirmatio
by lucasoshiro 2y ago
I don't understand a thing about most of the subjects depicted in those charts so I can't discuss their contents. But couldn't it be another case of confirmation bias and correlation not implying causation?
In other words, if I pick a random year since, perhaps, 1950 and try to find charts where that year is an inflection point, would it be different to 1971?
- 867-5309 2y agowas thinking the same. seems like a nice bunch of spurious cherries picked by typewriter-wielding bardmonkeys