4 ms·
Require human moderation. That naturally limits scale.
by matthewdgreen 2y ago
Require human moderation. That naturally limits scale.
- mmcdermott 2y ago> Require human moderation. That naturally limits scale. Does it? Does a human need to examine everything posted? You can certainly send letters without them going through a human moderator. Only what is flagged by a scanner? What if nothing is flagged? What should be flagged?
- rad_gruchalski 2y ago> Does it? Does a human need to examine everything posted? You can certainly send letters without them going through a human moderator. Because those are two orthogonal things. You aren’t sending a letter to be displayed by everyone and their dog on this planet to see.
- mmcdermott 2y agoYou can also print flyers, pamphlets, books, posters, and all such things without submitting them to a human censor (c.f. https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/SLT/literature/publishing/censorship.html https://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/SLT/literature/p... for this usage).
- rad_gruchalski 2y agoYes. To one address at a time. If you do a mass send, you'll get regulated at some point, too.
- arccy 2y agogreat way to burn out people and scar them for life, look at all the stories of facebook moderators etc.
- johnisgood 2y agoNah, they would use AI, and as such, would not really limit scale.
- conductr 2y agoIt raises the cost of the service therefore the need of user data monetization, I feel like this would backfire. I’d limit the revenue via bans on ads and data monetization.