3 ms·
> never choose Times New Roman or Arial, as those fonts are favored only by the apathetic and sloppy. Its a pity the author doesn't explain why. For some reas
by nuancebydefault 2y ago
> never choose Times New Roman or Arial, as those fonts are favored only by the apathetic and sloppy.
Its a pity the author doesn't explain why.
For some reason times new roman looks very good printed but is not very well readable on screens. Personally I don't like Arial much. A big no no is the capital i being indistinguishable from the l of lima.
- WCSTombs 2y agoIt's explained elsewhere in the book: > Fame has a dark side. When Times New Roman appears in a book, document, or advertisement, it connotes apathy. It says, “I submitted to the font of least resistance.” Times New Roman is not a font choice so much as the absence of a font choice, like the blackness of deep space is not a color. To look at Times New Roman is to gaze into the void. https://practicaltypography.com/times-new-roman-alternatives.html https://practicaltypography.com/times-new-roman-alternatives...
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]