3 ms·
> Horrible dev experience, no decent clients/libs, complex pricing, weird scaling in/out mechanism, slow, it only works well for well defined use-cases. Most o
by njitbew 2y ago
> Horrible dev experience, no decent clients/libs, complex pricing, weird scaling in/out mechanism, slow, it only works well for well defined use-cases.
Most of these arguments probably don't outweigh the benefits. If you're in need of a managed, highly-consistent, highly-scalable, distributed database, and you're already an AWS customer, what would you use instead?
- oweiler 2y agoAurora Serverless Postgres e.g.
- belter 2y agoCompletely different use cases....
- andrewstuart 2y agoPostgres running in a computer.