I'm not saying they want to do that. I said it creates the incentive, not the action per se. Not all facets of a given incentive are acted upon. I even underst

I'm not saying they want to do that. I said it creates the incentive, not the action per se. Not all facets of a given incentive are acted upon. I even understand the reason for the fee. It's to make sure developers give their maximum before submitting a game so they can avoid the need to patch and the fee in the first time. It creates an incentive for the developers, too... Hell, maybe it even costs more than $40000 for Microsoft to review the patches so they're being benevolent here and the whole thing is moot. I don't know, I don't work there. My post was merely to point that, when one creates an incentive, there might be many sides to it, therefore one must be careful when creating incentives. I'm an XBox owner who buys a lot of games (even arcade ones). I think it's the best Microsoft product I ever use (their awesome keyboards of circa 2001 being a close second). That XBox games on demand thing is just awesome. Will try to be less succinct when commenting in the future.