I can't see these in this article, at all. I think what it say is under "Is it the right kind of similarity?" : > Consider books. > For a literary critic, sim

I can't see these in this article, at all. I think what it say is under "Is it the right kind of similarity?" : > Consider books. > For a literary critic, similarity might mean sharing thematic elements. For a librarian, it's about genre classification. > For a reader, it's about emotions it evokes. For a typesetter, it's page count and format. > Each perspective is valid, yet cosine similarity smashes all these nuanced views into a single number — with confidence and an illusion of objectivity.