4 ms·
Yeah I don't think we're going to come closer to a real AGI until we manage to make a model that can actually understand and think. An LLM sounds smart but it j
by wkat4242 2y ago
Yeah I don't think we're going to come closer to a real AGI until we manage to make a model that can actually understand and think. An LLM sounds smart but it just picks the most likely response from the echoes of a billion human voices. I'm sure we'll get there but not with this tech. I'm pretty sure even be OpenAI said this with their 5 steps to AGI, LLMs were only step 1. And probably the part that will do the talking in the final AI but not the thinking.
At the moment people are so wooed by the confidence of current LLMs that they forget that there's all sorts of types of AI models. I think the key is going to be to have them work together, each doing the part they're good at.
- rlt 2y ago> An LLM sounds smart but it just picks the most likely response from the echoes of a billion human voices. This is where reasoning models come in. Train models on many logical statements then give them enough time to produce a chain of thoughts that’s indistinguishable from “understanding” and “thinking”. I’m not sure why this leap is so hard for some people to make.
- wkat4242 2y agoI personally don't think that will go very far. It's just a way of extracting a little bit more out of a technology that's the wrong one for the purpose.