3 ms·
Well, it wasn't if they'd (the company) create the posting. It was whether or not GP would say yes, or say no and get fired so someone else can do it. Can't bla
by johnnyanmac 2y ago
Well, it wasn't if they'd (the company) create the posting. It was whether or not GP would say yes, or say no and get fired so someone else can do it. Can't blame the messanger too much.
>they've already decided on getting cheaper immigrant workers, and then go through the fraudulent process to get them.
If it's truly banking talent, it lilely still isn't cheap. It's just talent that can't easily job hop in 1-2 years to a competing bank. It's a soft form of the anti-poaching agreements certain companies had over a decade ago.
Easiest way to mess that up for companies is to simply make a Visa applicable as long as that worker stays in the US sector of that industry. So the company does the work but gets no handcuffs. The idea of H1B's is to attract top talent, not hold them hostage at a single company.
- rsanek 2y ago>It was whether or not GP would say yes, or say no and get fired so someone else can do it you can rationalize anything with this kind of logic
- johnnyanmac 2y agoIn a world where we live to work, yes. Not everyone can be a whistleblower
- hmcq6 2y agoJust following orders