4 ms·
Actually, OpenAI provides Pydantic support for structured output (see client.beta.chat.completions.parse in https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/structured-o
by ngrislain 2y ago
Actually, OpenAI provides Pydantic support for structured output (see client.beta.chat.completions.parse in https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/structured-outputs https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/structured-outputs).
The library is compatible with that but does not use Pydantic further than that.
- juxtaposicion 2y agoRight the hope was to go further. E.g. if the input is: ``` class Classification(BaseModel): color: Literal['red', 'blue', 'green'] ``` then the output type would be: ``` class ClassificationWithLogProbs(BaseModel): color: Dict[Literal['red', 'blue', 'green'], float] ``` Don't take this too literally; I'm not convinced that this is the right way to do it. But it would provide structure and scores without dealing with a mess of complex JSON.
- lyu07282 2y agobut this ultimately just converts to json schema, or the openai function calling definition format. One question I always had was what about the descriptions you can attach to the class and attributes? ( = Field(description=...) in pydantic) is the model made aware of those descriptions?