3 ms·

The backlash arose for many reasons, but this article explains the most principled one: https://thecritic.co.uk/dylan-mulvaney-did-not-share-our-girlhood https

The backlash arose for many reasons, but this article explains the most principled one: https://thecritic.co.uk/dylan-mulvaney-did-not-share-our-girlhood https://thecritic.co.uk/dylan-mulvaney-did-not-share-our-gir... It's not priggish to take a stand against misogyny, is it?

azernik 2y ago
The "misogyny" that article purports is just... being publicly trans.
- blasorast 2y ago
  Exactly. It's fundamentally misogynistic for these men to appropriate a "woman" identity, and Mulvaney is a very typical example of this. Think about it. If you remove the female body from the definition of woman, what else remains besides sexist stereotypes?
  - azernik 2y ago
    No
BryantD 2y ago
So if you, in good faith, believe a behavior is oppressive, it's not priggish to take a stand against it? That would also demolish PG's entire argument.