3 ms·
> Would you like help moving those goal-posts for your supposedly easy to understand test? No. I'm estabilishing a previous important goal-post: no machine tur
by alganet 2y ago
> Would you like help moving those goal-posts for your supposedly easy to understand test?
No. I'm estabilishing a previous important goal-post: no machine turks. It's the current industry that laxed the requirements, not me that got more strict.
You don't seem to understand the difference between training data and context. Read about it, and re-read what I said with that concept in mind. All your answers are already there.
- ben_w 2y agoYou don't understand that you don't understand. What you demand for AI, is equivalent to denying humans with the requirement: "A pass is a human with no Linear A training data input that is able to reason on Linear A content".
- alganet 2y agoI demanded nothing. I made an observation about the nature of LLMs that so far remains unchecked. YOU came up with the idea of tests, and I tried to entertain you with some possibilities so you can understand better my point of view. YOU asked an impossible thing. You asked me to devise a test that proves that a fraudulent claim (LLMs have intelligence) is truthful. The best I can do is show you how silly that claim is. I actually don't need to prove anything. I just disproved something on a fundamental, ontological level. You're trying to make me go back on that ontodefinition or make a contradiction, which is not going to work.