As others have noted, this feels like an issue in the relying parties not relying on the `sub` field to validate the user. It feels the exact same as this issu

As others have noted, this feels like an issue in the relying parties not relying on the `sub` field to validate the user. It feels the exact same as this issue here: https://bhavukjain.com/blog/2020/05/30/zeroday-signin-with-apple https://bhavukjain.com/blog/2020/05/30/zeroday-signin-with-a.... In both, the details around the `sub` field, the field that should actually be used to identify the user, is poorly described. I would say that both of these feel a bit sensationalist, but then again, if relying parties are NOT using the sub field to validate users, they should be called out. It seems to be that a good way to make some money is find every such situation where RPs are not using sub, and submit vuln bugs.