3 ms·
There is nothing wrong with reductor ad absurdum to make a point about dependency and categories. It is the primary use case. I think there are a million pract
by s1artibartfast 2y ago
There is nothing wrong with reductor ad absurdum to make a point about dependency and categories. It is the primary use case.
I think there are a million practical challenges to implementing a fine. I wonder if there is enough incentives to draw employers to a verified list service.
- johnnyanmac 2y agoSure there is, it's in the name. We don't need an absurd argument for a punishment that is straightforward to explain. You usually use absurdum to simplify complex topics. Or I suppose to win a presidential debate, these days.
- s1artibartfast 2y agoI brought it up because people seemed genuinely confused on the idea that job listing background could matter for one person and not for another. Of course it is subjective until you introduce a context.