> We typically manage out people who aren’t meeting expectations over the course of a year, but now we’re going to do more extensive performance-based cuts duri

> We typically manage out people who aren’t meeting expectations over the course of a year, but now we’re going to do more extensive performance-based cuts during this cycle, with the intention of back filling these roles in 2025. Are they effectively saying that anyone terminated this year is probably for poor performance? Usually there's more ambiguity, like changing business priorities.