3 ms·
> It's considerably cheaper to us This is not true. The cheapest option is to not have services that require servers to maintain. Git continues to work if GitH
by liontwist 2y ago
> It's considerably cheaper to us
This is not true. The cheapest option is to not have services that require servers to maintain. Git continues to work if GitHub is down. So do shell scripts when CI is down. So why can’t we have an issue system where the underlying data is text files in a git branch?
I understand at scale you can pay people to optimize a process for the larger team, but there is a ton of unnecessary fragility before getting to that scale.
- vv_ 2y agoIf you're collaborating with a small group of people (or you're not running a huge amount of CI/CD) then you can make almost anything work. Once you get big it's another story entirely.