3 ms·
> I put in the footnote precisely to try to pre-empt this tedious digression. Next time, just don't try to advocate for your personal view of language, and use
by ruthmarx 2y ago
> I put in the footnote precisely to try to pre-empt this tedious digression.
Next time, just don't try to advocate for your personal view of language, and use a less contended term, as the parent said 'raises the question' would be fine.
> I believe a different phrasing would have been (marginally) less effective communication for readers who were sincerely trying to understand.
Nope. Raises the question is far clearer and less ambiguous.
> The only people who try to "correct" the phrasing are people who weren't actually interested in communication in the first place.
Or people who care about misinformation being spread.
- lmm 2y ago> Raises the question is far clearer and less ambiguous. "Raises the question" is less familiar and marginally more difficult to understand for people who are actually good-faith trying.
- ruthmarx 2y agoThat's not true at all. It's intuitive to understand, less ambiguous and far more common than the incorrect usage than you prefer. If you disagree, I would ask you to provide a source to support your assertion.