Spraying your attack into the public with hopes of hitting your target is the polar opposite of responsible. The only "good" part of this is that you were caug

Spraying your attack into the public with hopes of hitting your target is the polar opposite of responsible. The only "good" part of this is that you were caught in the act before anyone else got hit in the crossfire. In response, you suggest that you'll send a letter of apology to the funeral home of anyone that got hit. Compromising their credentials, even if you have "good intentions", still puts them into a compromised position and they have to react the same as they would for any other malevolent attacker. This is so close to "malicious" that it's hard to perceive a difference. edit: Let's also remind everyone that a Snyk stakeholder is currently attempting to launch a Cursor competitor, so assuming good intentions is even MORE of a stretch.