4 ms·
Firefox’s screenshot tool is a little more advanced than Print Screen. [0] There are situations where it’s really useful to be able to capture the entire web p
by ericrallen 2y ago
Firefox’s screenshot tool is a little more advanced than Print Screen. [0]
There are situations where it’s really useful to be able to capture the entire web page and not just the visible viewport.
[0]: https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/how-to-capture-screenshots-with-firefox/ https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/how-to-capture-...
- CubsFan1060 2y agoThis is great. I wish I could add a clock to it somehow. This would be super useful for auditing purposes.
- alexvitkov 2y agoFair point, but I highly doubt that this is how it's used most of the time. And taking 20 screenshots and compositing them in mspaint can be a meditative experience.
- oneeyedpigeon 2y agoI would put money on it being the most common use case. It's certainly the reason I installed a screenshot extension for Chrome. I like the nod towards humour you've added at the end there, but it's probably time to cash out your chips and accept your losses.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- sdht0 2y agoMoreover, Firefox makes it super easy to screenshot individual elements on a webpage, such as photos, by automatically determining the screenshot boundaries, which means I don't have to manually drag the screenshot area.
- 1718627440 2y agoIt seams to have a maximum length. If you try it on this page, it won't capture the whole page.