4 ms·
It isn't. Greenhouse emissions have remained roughly stagnant for over 30 years, while lung cancer deaths have dropped by 50-60 percent. Of course that's largel
by TaupeRanger 2y ago
It isn't. Greenhouse emissions have remained roughly stagnant for over 30 years, while lung cancer deaths have dropped by 50-60 percent. Of course that's largely due to a decrease in smoking, but without any concomitant increase in mortality from "bad air", I don't see how anyone could think it's a "big deal".
Sources:
https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indicators-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indica...
https://www.lung.org/research/trends-in-lung-disease/lung-cancer-trends-brief/lung-cancer-mortality-(1) https://www.lung.org/research/trends-in-lung-disease/lung-ca...
- pjc50 2y agoThose are two different things, though. Both linked to emissions, but in different ways. Also you had the wrong chart selected from that page, https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indicators-global-greenhouse-gas-emissions https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indica...
- jaapz 2y agoAre you seriously arguing that unhealthy air does not exist?
- TaupeRanger 2y agono, obviously not
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]