3 ms·
I understand all this. I didn’t say that static sites are easy to hack or valuable, I responded to GP’s claim “They cannot be hacked” I think static sites are
by prepend 2y ago
I understand all this. I didn’t say that static sites are easy to hack or valuable, I responded to GP’s claim “They cannot be hacked”
I think static sites are a good technique that has vastly improved security over dynamic sites, but thinking that using them makes you invincible is faulty.
- philistine 2y agoIf it makes you as vulnerable as S3, that's as close to invincible as you're going to get.
- prepend 2y agoDepends on where you host.
- philistine 2y agoThe whole website is on Amazon S3, that's where you host it!
- prepend 2y agoI host dozens of static sites, none of them run on s3.