7 ms·

Yeah, that's just nuts. Let's be very specific: the issue was that Bud Light hired Dylan Mulvaney to do a social media promotion. It's not as if Dylan's face wa

Yeah, that's just nuts. Let's be very specific: the issue was that Bud Light hired Dylan Mulvaney to do a social media promotion. It's not as if Dylan's face was on beer cans available in stores or anything. And this simple act caused a massive backlash. I would think that this might raise some questions about who exactly the prigs were in this instance.

blasorast 2y ago
The backlash arose for many reasons, but this article explains the most principled one: https://thecritic.co.uk/dylan-mulvaney-did-not-share-our-girlhood https://thecritic.co.uk/dylan-mulvaney-did-not-share-our-gir... It's not priggish to take a stand against misogyny, is it?
- azernik 2y ago
  The "misogyny" that article purports is just... being publicly trans.
  - blasorast 2y ago
    Exactly. It's fundamentally misogynistic for these men to appropriate a "woman" identity, and Mulvaney is a very typical example of this. Think about it. If you remove the female body from the definition of woman, what else remains besides sexist stereotypes?
    - azernik 2y ago
      No
- BryantD 2y ago
  So if you, in good faith, believe a behavior is oppressive, it's not priggish to take a stand against it? That would also demolish PG's entire argument.