2 ms·
I've heard people claim it was mostly so managed Windows laptops could force updates with the lid shut and the laptop suspended. That, but probably also to com
by microtonal 2y ago
I've heard people claim it was mostly so managed Windows laptops could force updates with the lid shut and the laptop suspended.
That, but probably also to compete with Mac's Power Nap feature (2012) that updates Mail, Messages, and other applications during sleep (so that when you open up the laptop messaging apps are immediately up to date):
https://www.engadget.com/2012-06-11-apple-introduces-power-nap-updates-your-mac-while-its-sleeping.html https://www.engadget.com/2012-06-11-apple-introduces-power-n...
Apple managed to do it without setting your laptop on fire. Meanwhile Dell recommends you to switch off a laptop when you put it in your backpack:
https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000124304/notebook-best-practices-for-care-and-use#:~:text=CAUTION%3A%20Dell%20Technologies%20recommends%20powering%20off%20the%20laptop%20completely%20before,drives%20or%20the%20AC%20adapter https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000124304/notebook-....
- actionfromafar 2y agoPerfect "we have PowerNap at home" moment for Dell and friends. Well played, Apple.
- 0x457 2y agoHold on, Apple used the same intel chips as everyone else when Power Nap was introduced. In fact, it was implemented via S0ix state. It's just almost no one except Apple figured how to utilize it correctly. Now i'm wondering if it's Apple fault that S3 got removed.
- goosedragons 2y agoNah. Apple's Intel implementation at least was equally crap. I've had my 2018 MBP cook itself in my bag a couple times.