3 ms·
Sorry, but at this point I don't think this article is appropriate for this website Additionally, what's with the amount of US politics discussion increasing l
by burgerrito 2y ago
Sorry, but at this point I don't think this article is appropriate for this website
Additionally, what's with the amount of US politics discussion increasing lately
- dang 2y agoIt's not increasing - whatever you're seeing is most likely random fluctuation. HN's approach to political stories was established a long time ago and we aren't changing it. https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&sort=byDate&type=comment&query=political%20overlap%20by:dang https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17014869 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17014869
- ternnoburn 2y agoWhat's intellectually interesting here? This article is mindless pap you could get anywhere online with some quick searching for anti woke. I don't mind political content if it's saying something novel, but this.... there's nothing here.
- rubzah 2y agoPaul Graham is an important figure in tech (and arguably even more so on this site). If he comes out on one side or another of an important issue, it is interesting to this community. IMHO. If Zuckerberg had written TFA, I'd be interested too.
- ternnoburn 2y agoIf Paul Graham published his list of favorite la croix flavors, would it be interesting because of who he is? I don't understand celebrity worship in the slightest -- if a celebrity says something, why does that make it valuable to listen? Especially if it's poorly written drivel.
- dang_almighty 2y ago[dead]
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- kaimac 2y agoare you the Daniel Gackle mentioned at the bottom of the article or a different one?