> butter is high in saturated fat. So we would expect junk food consumption to stay the same but now also have a larger atherogenic effect. Isn't the danger of

> butter is high in saturated fat. So we would expect junk food consumption to stay the same but now also have a larger atherogenic effect. Isn't the danger of saturated fat a longrunning myth, given the "France paradox" and the fact that high consumption of coconut oil (even higher in saturated fat) in places like Fiji doesn't have the negative effects that would be predicted if it were real?