4 ms·

I'm not really sure what the technical details were. This is the complaint, in case anyone is curious: https://trellis.law/doc/159246087/complaint-case-initiat

by ajb 2y ago

I'm not really sure what the technical details were. This is the complaint, in case anyone is curious: https://trellis.law/doc/159246087/complaint-case-initiation-complaint-filed-by-nautical-hero-group-llc-axiom-united-holdings-llc-vitality-international-management-llc-li-wenhui-refers-to-gao-ping https://trellis.law/doc/159246087/complaint-case-initiation-... Although obviously that's only from one side. If may be that it's less risky if there's a common service such as you describe, since the operator will prefer to keep their business going. But if significant assets are involved it may still be somewhat risky. (This was the company that supposedly ended up with the IP of the Kestrel aircraft, formerly owned by Alan Klapmeier and originated by Richard Noble as the Farnborough F1)

JumpCrisscross 2y ago
> if significant assets are involved it may still be somewhat risky No more than any asset in the EU. A nominee can steal your property about as easily as any notary.
- ajb 2y ago
  Thee context here (and upthread) is about needing a nominee because you aren't in the country. IE if you were in country you'd control the asset directly.
  - JumpCrisscross 2y ago
    > needing a nominee because you aren't in the country. IE if you were in country you'd control the asset directly Yes. A nominee is just a local contact of record. If a nominee can steal your shit, any rando with a notary can, too.
    - ajb 2y ago
      Are you positing a corrupt notary?