3 ms·
To be fair, it's actually different from the more traditional take on anti-glare (usually a separate film) in that Apple physically alters the glass surface dir
by int_19h 2y ago
To be fair, it's actually different from the more traditional take on anti-glare (usually a separate film) in that Apple physically alters the glass surface directly instead, which affects the colors less, so it's not just a pointless marketing distinction.
Whether the benefit justifies the price tag is another matter...
- cma 2y agoIsn't altering the texture essentially just 'matte' like most LCD displays used to be, just through something like etched glass like steamdeck had as an option?
- int_19h 2y agoIt is exactly what it is, and describing it as "anti-glare" or "matte" is reasonable and accurate. I'm just saying that I see why Apple uses a distinctive term instead to highlight the difference in their approach and its purported advantages.